NOTES FROM THE
HENGE
A dual-headed feline
named Gitties
Hired a dozen
expensive committees
To entitle his book
With a real catchy
hook
But he settled on
“Tale of Two Kitties”
I'm of two minds about this post. |
DOUBLETHINK DOESN’T STINK
Back in 2009 I stood
in line with some friends to see the first Star
Trek “reboot” movie on opening day. First, my bone fides: I’m a Trekkie from the days The Original Series (TOS) first
aired, back during the early Cretaceous. In fact, I’ve been regularly credited
-- ahem -- with making the very first Star
Trek fan film ever, which you can watch here. (I was ten and it’s been
downhill ever since.) And if you click here you can read a recent interview I
did about this eight-minute masterpiece. Oh, and also, my two Bantam Books science fiction novels even have a few Star
Trek “inside joke” references sprinkled in for fellow fans. So I’ve got
some pretty decent Trek cred.
Just needed to
establish that. Okay, then.
So there we were, me
and my wife and my friends, watching the eagerly anticipated “reboot” movie. My
friends loved it. My wife loved it. And… I? I
loved it. I cried, I laughed, I screamed, I sighed. I loved the casting, I
loved the sleek new design of the Enterprise, I loved the score (yay, Michael Giacchino
– a brilliant composer and really cool
human being I actually met that one time!), I loved the respectfully retro-ish
wardrobe, I loved the dazzling modern special effects, I loved all the winking
references to the original series (and the non-winking ones), and I loved the
campy closing credits featuring the classic theme. I came out wanting to watch
it again right away. I felt like I was ten years old again. Great film.
Ten-year-old me chewing the lack of scenery as Captain Kirk Jr. |
Then, just few days
later, I had a chat with a close buddy who’s also a Trek TOS aficionado. He hated the film. And he told me exactly why.
And I agreed with him. Everything he said was absolutely true. The plot was
full of ridiculous holes, the science was pathetically bad, the story made no
sense, the attitude and morality was completely at odds with the heart of the
original show, the tone was way more militaristic Star Wars than humanistic Star
Trek, and so on and so on. Horrible film.
I wasn’t lying when
I agreed with him. He was absolutely right.
A few years later I stood
in line for the sequel, Star Trek Into
Darkness, and the exact same thing happened. I loved it. Great film. And,
in hindsight, I also hated it, horrible film.
I’ve since bought
both of these movies on Blu-ray and watched them multiple times. Love them. And,
yes, kinda hate them, too.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
famously said, “The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold
two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to
function.”
Hmmm. I’m not sure Fitzy
would consider my intelligence “first rate,” but I do agree with him that it
can be a good thing to be able to juggle multiple views at once. Insisting that
all your opinions and thoughts are firm and unwavering can close your mind and
you end up missing out on stuff. Being able to hate and love the very same
thing is, I think, a plus.
Hell, I even
simultaneously hate and love certain people.
And I definitely both hate and love, say, New York City (sometimes for the very
same reasons). And, of course Los Angeles, where I live now. And stinky cheese.
And Lady Gaga. And the beach. And hats.
I just wish I still had those dreamy eyelashes. |
The old expression
about having a “love/hate relationship” with something doesn’t mean the love is
any less real or the hate any less deep.
A few years back my
wife and I, both of us serious anglophiles, were glued to the TV for an entire
weekend, watching every single one of the Queen’s “Diamond Jubilee” celebrations
taking place across the pond. We had a blast. We happily cheered (and even got
misty-eyed occasionally) during all the wonderful pomp and circumstance. We
reveled in the glorious, ornate outfits and grand music and all the blissfully-overblown
ceremonies. Such a wonderful spectacle to witness. I loved every single extravagant,
theatrical, oh-so-British second of
it.
I mentioned this to
a close friend the next week and he flew into a rage. He hated the monarchy. He
hated everything about it. The very idea
of it. He hated the massive waste of money and time and resources and real
estate, he hated its outdated, backward concept of divine right and strict
hierarchy, he hated all the brutal, oppressive history behind it, and most of
all he hated the fact that these “Royals” had done nothing at all to earn their glorified, privileged position
-- beyond being randomly born into the right family. Celebrating or exalting
the monarchy in any way was, he insisted, a disgusting disgrace.
I totally agreed
with him.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI just loved hating that I did and hated loving it too. You showed me a thing or two rrrrrrright therrrrrrrrrr. He said rolling his Rrrrrrrrrrssss acrrrros the blog. Tell the Queen to give us back our Stone of Destiny. Your Scottish friend and King Gregory Lawrence Stewart.
DeleteP. S. The rrrrrremoved comment wuz the same. Editing in a blog is like being ooot on the moors trrrrrrrying to keep frrrrrom being pooled daown by the stinking sinking bog.
ReplyDeleteNo sure what "removed content" was. Only "editing" I did was adding a missing space between two words. ;-)
DeleteI removed my own comment to edit it and re publish it. That's all off topic I guess. Is there something going on in the...yes if we could all open our minds and see both sides now there would not be a bunch of babies in that cradle of civilization over there in...well you know. Oops off topic again.
ReplyDeleteIndeed!
Delete